The AlpiLinK (Alpine Languages in Contact) project, developed in collaboration between the Universities of Verona, Trento, Bolzano-Bozen, Turin, and Aosta Valley, aims at promoting and investigating the Germanic, Romance and Slavic minority languages and dialects spoken across the Alpine regions of Italy: Piedmont, Aosta Valley, Lombardy, Veneto, Trentino-South Tyrol, and Friuli-Venezia Giulia. The project is funded by the Italian Research Ministry as ‘project of relevant national interest’ (Progetto di ricerca di rilevante interesse nazionale, PRIN, call 2020, project n.  2020SYSYBS).

AlpiLinK is a continuation and expansion of the VinKo (Varieties in Contact) project of the Universities of Verona, Trento, and Bolzano-Bozen, and it is from this project that the digital infrastructure was inherited. More information can be found in the VinKo project description and in Kruijt, Rabanus & Tagliani (2023).

AlpiLinK follows an Open Science Policy which includes the FAIR principles for the data management, e.g. guaranteeing the permanent accessibility of contents and the simple resusability of data thanks to open licenses. All data collected in AlpiLinK can be found in the AlpiLinK corpus (Rabanus et al. 2023) on Zenodo.

AlpiLinK aims to document cross-linguistically comparable data from the non-standard language varieties, e.g. dialects and minority languages, spoken in the alpine regions of Italy. The data collection in the project is done via online crowdsourcing on this website (go to the “Participate” section to participate). Any speaker of the investigated language varieties, e.g. Walser German or Venetan dialect (for full list go to “Our Varieties“), can register on the platform and participate in the linguistic survey by audio-recording their answers to a variety of linguistic tasks (e.g. translation, image description etc.).

The collected audio files will be made freely available on the interactive map “Listen & Explore” (currently hosting data from the preceding  VinKo project), which can be consulted by anyone interested in exploring the gathered data and learning more about the multilingual environment characterising the area under investigation. 

The data will also stored in an online repository which constitutes a valuable open-access resource for both the researchers and the members of the communities involved, similar to the data from the VinKo project now (see Rabanus et al. 2022). In this way, the entire dataset will be archived at the Eurac Research Clarin Centre (ERCC) in Bozen-Bolzano, and will be periodically updated.

AlpiLinK investigates a selection of linguistic features through the comparative analysis of linguistic audio data collected via crowdsourcing. Linguistic research of the different features of a language can provide insight into a place’s history, culture, and social structure. To illustrate this, let’s have a brief look at the way that people pronounce <s> across Trentino-South Tyrol and Veneto. In the Tyrolean dialects, the pronunciation of the <s> depends on where it occurs in a word and by which sound it is followed. For example, when the <s> occurs word-initially before <p, t, k, m, n, l, w> it is pronounced like <sh>([ʃ] in the International Phonetic Alphabet). However, word-medially in front of <m> or <n>, it is pronounced as a “regular” <s>. Hear the difference yourself and compare the words speziell ‘special’ and Rosmarin ‘rosemary’.

Speziell ‘special’ (Tyrolean)

 

or <r>Rosmarin ‘rosemary’ (Tyrolean)

 

This difference in pronunciation is known as s-retraction. This phenomenon is common in German varieties, but not very common in Romance languages, e.g. Trentino and Venetan dialects. Interestingly, the Ladin languages, part of the (Rhaeto-)Romance family, form an exception to this rule. For example, in Gardenese Ladin, a very similar pattern to the Tyrolean dialects is found, where the <s> word-initially before <p, t, k, m, n, l, f, v> is pronounced as <sh> like in ‘fish’, i.e. [ʃ], and like a “regular” <s> word-medially in front of <m>. Listen to spiedl ‘mirror’ and rosmarin ‘rosemary’.

Spiedl ‘mirror’ (Gardenese Ladin)

 

Rosmarin ‘rosemary’ (Gardenese Ladin)

 

The difference between Ladin and the other Romance varieties most likely comes from a mix of language-internal changes and language-contact effects. For centuries Ladin speakers have interacted with and in German varieties, exposing them to their different <s> pronunciations and the system behind these different pronunciations. However, not only historic contact with other peoples can play a role, but also the internal structures of the language itself. Many dialect communities in Trentino have had similar long-term contacts with German varieties, but the Trentino dialects only have a single version of <s>. This is due to a structural difference between Ladin and the dialects of Trentino. Historically, Ladin developed a contrast between [ʃ] and [ś] (a sound half-way in between [s] and [ʃ]). Throughout time the intermediate [ś] was changed in its pronunciation. Depending on the context the old sound has been either retracted and merged with [ʃ] or fronted to the “regular” [s], resulting in the above described [s]-[ʃ] alternation in Ladin. Contrastingly, the Trentino dialects historically only had [ś] and not [ʃ]. Hence, they lacked the preconditions for the retraction of [ś] to [ʃ]. In this way the distribution of the <s> pronunciatons in Ladin is the result of a language-internal process supported by the intense contact with the German varieties (Alber, Kokkelmans & Rabanus 2021).